About Memoahoney
Written by the Memoahoney Editorial Desk · Reviewed by Dr. Judith Leone-Friedman, neuropsychologist · Revised
A retailer that publishes what it found, including the parts that do not help sell anything.
Memoahoney is the USA Authorized MemoHoney Retailer operating from 420 Lexington Avenue, Floor 16, New York, NY 10170, with returns handled at 950 Third Avenue, Floor 7, New York, NY 10022. We are not the manufacturer; the label says distributed by Instituto Experience, PO Box 12730, Ogden, UT 84404. We earn a commission on orders placed through this site. Our editorial rules are that the printed label beats every other source, that nothing is invented, and that anything missing is printed as missing.
The neuropsychologist who reviews MemoHoney pages here
Dr. Judith Leone-Friedman is a neuropsychologist and the reviewer for this site. The review covers the label transcriptions, the ingredient and safety pages, the FAQ answers and each journal post, and the reviewer is named in the byline of every page and in the review sheet at its foot, beside the date the page was last revised.
A review checks that a page agrees with the printed label and the sources it cites, and that its cautions are complete. It is not an endorsement of MemoHoney, nor guidance about your own health. A change that touches a dose, a direction or a safety note goes back for review before the date moves. What the review covers.
Who we are
Memoahoney is a retail and review desk for one product. We take orders, we publish what the label says, and we say what we think of it.
We are not the manufacturer and we do not pretend otherwise. The label reads distributed by Instituto Experience, PO Box 12730, Ogden, UT 84404, as printed on the label, with the telephone number a telephone number with a 507 area code and the address [email protected]. No manufacturer is named on the pack at all.
Our office is 420 Lexington Avenue, Floor 16, New York, NY 10170. Returns are handled at 950 Third Avenue, Floor 7, New York, NY 10022. The order desk's number and this website's own address are both listed in the footer.
Those are the only addresses and numbers connected with this site. We have not invented an extra street, a laboratory, a licence or a head office to look larger than we are.
The five rules we write by
The printed label wins. Where the label and the brief disagree, the label is right and the disagreement gets printed. There are seven such conflicts on this product and they are all listed on the home page.
Never invent a fact. No price, no doctor, no laboratory, no testimonial, no study and no PubMed ID that we cannot point at. Anything we do not have is printed as not published.
Only cite what we opened. Every source in our reference list is a page we read. Where a source reports its own weaknesses, we quote those too.
Never write FDA approved. No supplement is. We write made in an FDA-registered facility, and then we explain what that means.
Publish the criticism on the same page as the buy button. Not in a footer, not behind a link. The first substantive section of our home page is about the phrase on the front of the bottle.
Because the alternative is a page that agrees with everything and is therefore worth nothing. A reader who can see us criticise the product we sell has some reason to believe the rest.
How we make money, stated plainly
Orders placed through the buy buttons on this site earn this site a commission. That is the whole of our funding model and there is nothing hidden about it.
It creates an obvious incentive to be positive, and the honest way to handle an incentive is to disclose it and then act against it where the evidence requires.
So: this site scores the product it sells 2.4 out of 5, and the highest-scoring rows are both about the label rather than the formula. It publishes fifteen things the seller has not published. It refuses to print a star rating because the one we were given is marked as layout copy. It opens its home page with the full printed panel.
None of that is good for conversion. All of it is on the site.

We are a retailer for one product and a review desk for the same one. That is a conflict of interest, we state it on five pages, and the way we handle it is to publish everything we found — including a chart on which only one row can be drawn delivers a fifteenth of the dose the studies used.
Where our sources disagree with each other
| Conflict | What we did |
|---|---|
| The telephone number on the bottle is not the order number on this site | The label prints a number with a 507 area code beside the distributor block. The brief supplied for this site gives a different one, listed in the footer, as the sales and refund desk. beside the distributor block. The brief supplied for this site gives the order desk (its number is in the footer) as the sales and refund desk. Both are real numbers in the pack and they are different. Use the one on this site for orders placed here, because that is the desk with the order record; the number on the bottle belongs to the distributor. |
| The brief's dose is shorter than the label's | The brief says take 1 capsule daily with a glass of water, preferably in the morning before a meal. The label says take one (1) capsule daily with an 8 oz. glass of water. For best results, take 20-30 minutes before a meal with 8 oz of water or as directed by your healthcare professional — the label’s own words. Same dose, but the label specifies the volume, the window and the deferral to a clinician. The label governs. |
| The marketing names six ingredients; the panel declares seven | The Inside MemoHoney artwork is headed six named ingredients and the written brief lists the same six. Both omit the calcium, which is on the printed panel at 18 mg. Nothing is concealed — the panel is the document that governs and it lists all seven — but a buyer reading only the artwork has seen six of seven. |
| The printed calcium percentage does not survive a recalculation | 18 mg against the FDA's 1,300 mg Daily Value is 1.4%, which to the nearest whole percent is 1%. The panel prints 1.5%. The niacin percentage on the same panel is correct. |
| An unqualified Made in USA badge sits beside a correctly qualified label | The bottle says Manufactured in the USA with globally sourced ingredients. The listing carries two unqualified Made in USA roundels. The FTC reserves the unqualified claim for products that are “all or virtually all” made in the United States. |
| The photographs show four ingredients the product does not contain | Ginkgo leaves, lion's mane mushrooms, blueberries and a herb sprig are staged around the bottle in the product scene. None is on the panel and the brand claims none of them in writing. |
| The brand name points at an ingredient that is not in the bottle | MemoHoney, a honeycomb logo, dripping-honey artwork and a bee. No honey on the panel and none in the other-ingredients line. |
| A bonus e-book uses a word the product's own disclaimer rules out | The product's boxed disclaimer says it is not intended to cure any disease. A bonus supplied with it is titled 101 Herbal Cures. 21 CFR 101.93 lists statements in accompanying material among the ways a disease claim may be made. |
What nobody published about this product
- Any published human trial on this formula. None exists, and none is claimed. Every dose comparison on this site is against research on single ingredients.
- A price. No pack price was published to us. Pack prices are the ones printed at checkout on the info page.
- A cost per capsule or per day. Cannot be published, because no price was.
- The arginine content of the AKG 2:1 extract. The ratio is printed but none of our sources converts it, so this site does not.
- The citrulline content of the HCl salt. The NIH gives the conversion for citrulline malate, 56.64%, and none for the hydrochloride.
- Any standardisation or assay figure. Amino acids are single compounds so this matters less than on a botanical, but no purity or assay statement is printed.
- A certificate of analysis. The brief gives the reference MEM-7647-26-ME and says in its own words that it is a draft label, not lab proof.
- The name of the third-party laboratory behind the tested mark on the listing.
- The name of the physician behind the physician-formulated mark.
- A street address for the distributor. The label prints a PO Box in Ogden, Utah.
- An expiry date. The brief says the lot and best-before appear on the base of the bottle when the bottle shows them.
- Shipping cost, speed and international availability. None was published.
- Verified customer reviews. The supplied review block is marked as layout copy in its own source document, so this site publishes no star rating and no order count.
- Any evidence for the oxidative stress claim. Nothing in the seven printed ingredients is an antioxidant in the ordinary sense and no source we opened attaches an antioxidant effect to any of them.
- Any honey. Not on the panel and not in the other-ingredients line.
Who writes this
If anything on this site is wrong, tell us and we will fix it and say that we did. Write to the website inbox in the footer, Monday to Friday, 9:00 am to 5:00 pm ET. That address handles pages, typos, privacy and press; it cannot see orders, and for anything about an order the order desk in the footer is the one that works.
About Memoahoney: common questions
Who sells this site?
Memoahoney, a USA Authorized MemoHoney Retailer. We are a retailer, not the manufacturer and not a clinic. The manufacturer is not named anywhere on the label; the distributor printed on the bottle is Instituto Experience of Ogden, Utah.
Who makes it?
The manufacturer is not named. The label prints Distributed by: Instituto Experience, PO Box 12730, Ogden, UT 84404, with a telephone number and an email. 21 CFR 101.5 requires the name and place of business of the manufacturer, packer or distributor, and permits a street address to be omitted only if it is shown in a current city or telephone directory. We could not verify that either way.
How do you make money?
We earn a commission on orders placed through this site. That is why the honest version of this page matters: the sentence telling a reader that eighty capsules would reach a studied citrulline dose costs us sales rather than earning them, and it is on the home page, the ingredients page and this one.
Why does it score 2.4?
Because the label is excellent and the formula is not, and the score has to carry both. Panel completeness gets five out of five — the first we have awarded. Dose against the evidence gets half a mark. The average is 2.4 and we would rather publish that than round it in either direction.
Why are there no customer reviews here?
Because the review block supplied with this product is marked, in its own source document, as layout copy only. Printing those names and star ratings would be inventing customers. When verified reviews exist we will publish them and say how they were verified.
Which number do I call about an order?
The order desk’s number, listed in the footer. The website email, also in the footer, is for pages, typos, privacy and press — it cannot see orders.
Is it FDA approved?
No dietary supplement is. The FDA “does not have the authority to approve dietary supplements before they are marketed”. The listing's badge says a registered facility, which is an administrative filing about a factory rather than an assessment of the product.
Ready to try MemoHoney?
One bottle is 30 capsules at one a day, so a bottle is thirty days and the 60-day guarantee still has thirty left to run when it ends. The guarantee runs from purchase, not from delivery, and the price is shown at checkout.
Order NowRead the label firstNo price was published to us. We print no figure we have not seen ourselves. · 60-day guarantee from purchase · Not for under 18, pregnancy or nursing