Panel completeness
Every dietary ingredient carries a printed amount. No proprietary blend, no hidden total. The first five this desk has awarded on this line.5.0
Label construction
Serving size, servings per container, a complete other-ingredients line, a four-part caution panel, a storage line, a correctly qualified origin statement, a boxed FDA disclaimer and a distributor block with a telephone number and an email. Half a mark off for the PO Box and for the calcium percentage.4.5
Arithmetic on the label
The niacin percentage is correct. The calcium percentage is not: 1.4% printed as 1.5%. One error out of two, on the smaller number.4.0
Dose against the evidence
Fifteen capsules for the bottom of the arginine range, forty for the bottom of the beta-alanine range, eighty for a studied citrulline malate dose. The label says one a day. The half mark is for the niacin, which is sensibly dosed.0.5
Evidence for the category
No published human trial on this formula. The ingredients are from the exercise shelf, and NCCIH's cognition digest does not mention amino acids at all.0.5
Claim discipline
The bottle's own claim is ordinary structure-function wording. The listing reaches further with protect and improve, and a bonus e-book uses the word cures.2.0
Marketing honesty
Ginkgo, lion's mane and blueberries in the photographs and none in the bottle; a honeycomb brand with no honey; a physician-formulated mark with no physician named.1.5
Price clarity
No price published in advance. Pack prices appear at checkout only, so no comparison is possible before the decision to click.1.5
Overall2.4 / 5
2.4 out of 5. This is the best label this desk has read and one of the weakest formulas, and those two sentences are the same sentence. Full disclosure is what lets anybody see that a capsule holding 100 mg of citrulline malate is an eightieth of a studied dose; a proprietary blend would have hidden exactly that. We would rather review this product than any of the four before it, and we would not buy it for the reason it is sold.